In a post on his X account on Wednesday, President Masoud Pezeshkian highlighted the importance of unity in the face of challenges, asserting that the ceasefire reflects the principles sought by Iran and the overwhelming support of its citizens.
“The ceasefire, with the acceptance of the general principles desired by Iran, is the fruit of the blood of our martyred Leader, great Khamenei, and the achievement of the presence of all people in the scene,” the president said.
“From today onwards, we will continue to stand side by side. Whether in the field of diplomacy, in the field of defense, in the streets, or in the realm of service. Our unity is a victory,” he added.
The US and the Israeli regime launched a large-scale unprovoked military campaign against Iran following the assassination of then Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyed Ali Khamenei, along with several senior military commanders and civilians on February 28.
In retaliation, Iranian Armed Forces launched attacks on American and Israeli positions in the region, demonstrating their capability to strike back effectively. Despite initial expectations by the attackers of a swift victory, the Iranian response proved significantly more potent, inflicting heavy damage on US and Israeli military resources while rallying the nation's unity and resistance.
While the US president had issued an ultimatum, Pakistani mediation facilitated an agreement for a two-week ceasefire during which negotiations would take place in Islamabad. Iran has proposed a ten-point plan as the foundation for discussions, seeking terms such as the withdrawal of US forces from the region, lifting sanctions, and establishing control over the Strait of Hormuz.
The Supreme National Security Council of Iran emphasized on April 8 that the aggression led to a historic victory for Iran, compelling the US to accept negotiation terms, including a plan for guaranteed non-aggression and the cessation of hostilities.
Iran has stressed that the negotiations would not signify an end to the conflict but rather an extension of the battlefield into diplomatic efforts, with a clear stance of distrust towards the US.